This week I wanted to change-up my blog from the typical current event to a more factual information that creates some debate.
What is the true definition of a third-world country? according to Wikipedia, it is based on social, economic and political conditions. Countries in Africa, Latin American and Asia are considered third-world countries. In some articles that I read, Colombia is considered a third-world country, but in others, it is considered a second-world country (also known as developing country). But what is the difference between these two?
Colombia could be considered a third-world country because of the abundant poverty that exists. As I mentioned in one of my previous posts, Colombia has both absolute and relative poverty. Absolute poverty is living in complete misery. No running water, electricity or food. People living out on the streets and begging for food. Obviously little to no education and sometimes these poor families engage in drug trafficking and violence because it is a ”last” resource.
On the other hand, Colombia could be considered a developing country for the following reasons. Colombia has metropolitan cities center of diverse culture, business and tourism. (ie, Bogota, Medellin, Cali, Cartagena and Barranquilla) Colombia is a major exporter of oil resources, coffee, emeralds, flowers, textiles, etc.. Poverty is not necessarily an effect from lack of education or resources, but instead, it is a growing problem because of the high violence of the guerrillas and political corruption.
I know Colombia because I was born there and lived there until I was 10 years old. I’ve seen absolute poverty and clearly understand why it is called a third-world country. I’ve seen completely deplorable conditions that someone in this country would be shocked to see. But even though I have seen poverty and misery, I have also seen beautiful and developing things in Colombia that makes some people call it a developing country. More construction is happening at this very instant. Schools, offices, shopping centers are making an abundant contribute to the country.
I guess if someone wants to call Colombia a ”type” of country, it is up to each individual to do so based on the knowledge they each have about the country. Each country has good and bad things, and unfortunately some of these bad things make a country be labeled.